Skip to main content

The DP versus Boniface: What you need to know

As we observe the defamation proceedings between Deputy President William Ruto and Activist Boniface Mwangi, words and phrases keep flying around. Without going into the merits of the case – the matter being under judicial consideration and therefore prohibited from public discussion, the public ought to be enlightened of some of these words and terminologies.

I will rely on a simple example to explain. Kamau files papers in court accusing Wafula of uttering or writing certain words causing damage to his reputation. This is what you would call a claim. Wafula while exercising his right of reply has two options; he can file papers denying the accusation even denying ever uttering or writing those words – this would be called a defence, or Wafula may opt to file a claim within Kamau’s claim with the intention of defending himself and offsetting Kamau’s claim even surpassing the enormity of Kamau’s claim. In this case, not only does Wafula deny what he is accused of, he goes on to show why he either feels aggrieved and/or that that Kamau never had a reputation worthy of protection.

Before the case goes to trial, the conduct of civil cases dictates that there is exchange of documents (evidence) to be relied on - a process known as discovery. If for any reason, either of the parties feels or is of the opinion that the other is withholding information critical to the proper adjudication of this dispute, they are at liberty to seek the court’s intervention and an order by the Court directing the issuance of this information must be obeyed before commencement of trial.

In this legal controversy, Kamau must show that Wafula made a statement, the statement was published, the statement caused an injury, the statement was false and the statement is not protected by privilege – one made by a witness giving testimony in a court of law.

This legal controversy of course touches on the delicate balance between one person’s right to freedom of speech and another’s right to protect their good name. Discourse is essential to a free society and the more open and honest the discourse, the better for society.

If Kamau is a public official or a celebrity, he is subject to scrutiny and criticism – a higher priority is placed on the members of the public being allowed to speak their minds about elected officials and public figures. Kamau would therefore get lesser protection from alleged defamatory statements and faces a higher burden when attempting to win the suit against Wafula. Not only must Kamau show proof of what we have discussed above, actual malice must also be proved. Did Wafula have reckless disregard for whether or not what he uttered was true of not?


We continue to keenly follow the case between DP Ruto and Activist Boniface Mwangi and hope that if for anything, it will demystify, bring clarity and improve jurisprudence on Kenya’s defamation laws vis-a-vis free speech protected by the Constitution.

*** A version of this post was published in the 9th November, 2016 Edition of The Star Newspaper which you can access HERE  ****

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Madaraka Day @49 – What Exactly Does Attaining Self Rule Mean?

Courtesy of The Daily Nation The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (adopted 14 th December, 1960) says the following about the importance of Independence; “ The General Assembly, Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory… .” The Preamble to the Constitution of Kenya 2010 says; “ We the people of Kenya – Honouring those who heroically struggled to bring freedom and justice to our land: Exercising our sovereign and inalienable right to determine the form of governance ...
Post a Comment
Read more

LATEST COURT OF APPEAL APPOINTMENTS - Kudos JSC!!

Once again the JSC is 'on-point' in its latest appointment of 7 new judges of the Court of Appeal. The ration of appointments is clearly in favour of the women i.e. 5 out of the 7 are women. This follows the earlier appointment of 28 new judges of the High Court 13 of whom were women. Indeed, the Court of Appeal has been largely identified with a perpetual delay in the administration with many calling upon it to work at changing its public image. Indeed, the Justice William Ouko led Task force report not only only found that there were vacancies at the court of appeal (11 instead of the then 14 allowed) but even out of the 11 judges, there was no woman judge at the Court of Appeal. The Constitution of Kenya, as a result of a reflection on some of these grave inequities and disparities is very clear on the issue of gender representation at all levels of and in all arms of government. Whether a woman judge matters can be seen from some reflections in this rather short, simple...
Post a Comment
Read more

THE “HOUSE OF TERROR” – Reflections….

The "House of Terror" - Budapest, 1062 Andrassy ut 60 So today I finally got to visit the ‘House of Terror’ one of those places you certainly ought to visit if you ever pass by Budapest, Hungary! It is described as a museum that commemorates the victims of terror as well as a reminder of the dreadful acts of terror carried out by ‘victimizers’. The building, and the museum inside are a vivid, impressive recreation of different periods of Hungarian history that the country has tried to move on from albeit painfully. The Different sections of the Museum that begins with a hallway full of victims, then instruments of torture, actual cells, gallows and a morgue, witness accounts displayed on screens and pictures that tell a thousand words all bear testimony to the atrocities witnessed and meted. The building housed the Hungarian Nazis in the early 1940’s and later a residence of the AVO and subsequently the AVH who are known to have participated in the worst forms of crimes agai...
3 comments
Read more