Skip to main content

East African Court of Justice - Extended Jurisdiction

In regional news, The East African Court of Justice (EACJ) can now handle crimes of international proportion such as genocide, crimes against humanity, terrorism and war crimes following endorsement by East African Community Heads of State.


The extension of the Court's mandate was made during the EAC Heads of State Summit in Nairobi, Kenya, last week, that was held under the theme, "Deepening and accelerating integration: Towards Political Federation."

The EACJ is the judicial body of the East African Community (EAC). The Court has jurisdiction over the interpretation and application of the East African Treaty of 1999. The Court does not have competence to hear individual complaints of alleged violations of human rights law. 

The Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community sets out in Article 27 that, “The Court shall have such other original, appellate, human rights and other jurisdiction as will be determined by the Council at a suitable subsequent date. To this end, the Partner States shall conclude a protocol to operationalise the extended jurisdiction.”

Efforts to operationalise this extended jurisdiction begun many years ago culminating in May 2005 when the Council of Ministers issued a Draft Protocol to operationalise the Extended Jurisdiction of the East African Court of Justice. Nearly 10 years later, the Protocol has not yet been approved.

It is therefore suspect that the Summit would opt to rush to give the Court jurisdiction over International Crimes and Terrorism while neglecting a nearly 10 year wait for the Court's Human Rights Jurisdiction. Interestingly, international crimes issues still significantly touch on human rights violations. 

The Summit's decision is not surprising given the recent utterances and push by organs of the EAC including the Summit and the East African Legislative Assembly(EALA) to have the cases against Kenya's President Kenyatta, Deputy President Ruto and Journalist Sang brought to Arusha. Following this, the Court's Registrar announced that it had the capacity to try international crimes. 

The Court has however not shied away from adjudicating over matters touching on human rights. The Court has creatively dealt with human rights issues using Rule of law provisions e.g. in the Katabazi Case  where the court did not evaluate the claims within a human rights framework but found that the respondent had violated the principle of the rule of law and consequently contravened the Treaty. 

If the region is focused on improving the lives and dignity of its over 140 Million citizens, then the Human Rights language should form a constant part of the discussions around regional integration. It is hoped that the Protocol will be signed soon and the same reflected in constitutions and laws of all the five EAC member states. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Madaraka Day @49 – What Exactly Does Attaining Self Rule Mean?

Courtesy of The Daily Nation The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (adopted 14 th December, 1960) says the following about the importance of Independence; “ The General Assembly, Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory… .” The Preamble to the Constitution of Kenya 2010 says; “ We the people of Kenya – Honouring those who heroically struggled to bring freedom and justice to our land: Exercising our sovereign and inalienable right to determine the form of governance ...

LATEST COURT OF APPEAL APPOINTMENTS - Kudos JSC!!

Once again the JSC is 'on-point' in its latest appointment of 7 new judges of the Court of Appeal. The ration of appointments is clearly in favour of the women i.e. 5 out of the 7 are women. This follows the earlier appointment of 28 new judges of the High Court 13 of whom were women. Indeed, the Court of Appeal has been largely identified with a perpetual delay in the administration with many calling upon it to work at changing its public image. Indeed, the Justice William Ouko led Task force report not only only found that there were vacancies at the court of appeal (11 instead of the then 14 allowed) but even out of the 11 judges, there was no woman judge at the Court of Appeal. The Constitution of Kenya, as a result of a reflection on some of these grave inequities and disparities is very clear on the issue of gender representation at all levels of and in all arms of government. Whether a woman judge matters can be seen from some reflections in this rather short, simple...

THE “HOUSE OF TERROR” – Reflections….

The "House of Terror" - Budapest, 1062 Andrassy ut 60 So today I finally got to visit the ‘House of Terror’ one of those places you certainly ought to visit if you ever pass by Budapest, Hungary! It is described as a museum that commemorates the victims of terror as well as a reminder of the dreadful acts of terror carried out by ‘victimizers’. The building, and the museum inside are a vivid, impressive recreation of different periods of Hungarian history that the country has tried to move on from albeit painfully. The Different sections of the Museum that begins with a hallway full of victims, then instruments of torture, actual cells, gallows and a morgue, witness accounts displayed on screens and pictures that tell a thousand words all bear testimony to the atrocities witnessed and meted. The building housed the Hungarian Nazis in the early 1940’s and later a residence of the AVO and subsequently the AVH who are known to have participated in the worst forms of crimes agai...