Skip to main content

East African Court of Justice - Extended Jurisdiction

In regional news, The East African Court of Justice (EACJ) can now handle crimes of international proportion such as genocide, crimes against humanity, terrorism and war crimes following endorsement by East African Community Heads of State.


The extension of the Court's mandate was made during the EAC Heads of State Summit in Nairobi, Kenya, last week, that was held under the theme, "Deepening and accelerating integration: Towards Political Federation."

The EACJ is the judicial body of the East African Community (EAC). The Court has jurisdiction over the interpretation and application of the East African Treaty of 1999. The Court does not have competence to hear individual complaints of alleged violations of human rights law. 

The Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community sets out in Article 27 that, “The Court shall have such other original, appellate, human rights and other jurisdiction as will be determined by the Council at a suitable subsequent date. To this end, the Partner States shall conclude a protocol to operationalise the extended jurisdiction.”

Efforts to operationalise this extended jurisdiction begun many years ago culminating in May 2005 when the Council of Ministers issued a Draft Protocol to operationalise the Extended Jurisdiction of the East African Court of Justice. Nearly 10 years later, the Protocol has not yet been approved.

It is therefore suspect that the Summit would opt to rush to give the Court jurisdiction over International Crimes and Terrorism while neglecting a nearly 10 year wait for the Court's Human Rights Jurisdiction. Interestingly, international crimes issues still significantly touch on human rights violations. 

The Summit's decision is not surprising given the recent utterances and push by organs of the EAC including the Summit and the East African Legislative Assembly(EALA) to have the cases against Kenya's President Kenyatta, Deputy President Ruto and Journalist Sang brought to Arusha. Following this, the Court's Registrar announced that it had the capacity to try international crimes. 

The Court has however not shied away from adjudicating over matters touching on human rights. The Court has creatively dealt with human rights issues using Rule of law provisions e.g. in the Katabazi Case  where the court did not evaluate the claims within a human rights framework but found that the respondent had violated the principle of the rule of law and consequently contravened the Treaty. 

If the region is focused on improving the lives and dignity of its over 140 Million citizens, then the Human Rights language should form a constant part of the discussions around regional integration. It is hoped that the Protocol will be signed soon and the same reflected in constitutions and laws of all the five EAC member states. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Madaraka Day @49 – What Exactly Does Attaining Self Rule Mean?

Courtesy of The Daily Nation The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (adopted 14 th December, 1960) says the following about the importance of Independence; “ The General Assembly, Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory… .” The Preamble to the Constitution of Kenya 2010 says; “ We the people of Kenya – Honouring those who heroically struggled to bring freedom and justice to our land: Exercising our sovereign and inalienable right to determine the form of governance ...

LATEST COURT OF APPEAL APPOINTMENTS - Kudos JSC!!

Once again the JSC is 'on-point' in its latest appointment of 7 new judges of the Court of Appeal. The ration of appointments is clearly in favour of the women i.e. 5 out of the 7 are women. This follows the earlier appointment of 28 new judges of the High Court 13 of whom were women. Indeed, the Court of Appeal has been largely identified with a perpetual delay in the administration with many calling upon it to work at changing its public image. Indeed, the Justice William Ouko led Task force report not only only found that there were vacancies at the court of appeal (11 instead of the then 14 allowed) but even out of the 11 judges, there was no woman judge at the Court of Appeal. The Constitution of Kenya, as a result of a reflection on some of these grave inequities and disparities is very clear on the issue of gender representation at all levels of and in all arms of government. Whether a woman judge matters can be seen from some reflections in this rather short, simple...

Supreme Court Presidential Petition Number 4 of 2017 (Njonjo Mue & Another Vs. Chairperson IEBC & 3 Others

Post backdated to 20th November, 2017:  About 2 weeks ago, i was called up by a seniour lawyer who asked me to join him for an early morning meeting. It is at that meeting that i was invited to be part of the legal team preparing a petition challenging the election of Hon. Uhuru Kenyatta - Supreme Court Presidential Petition 4 of 2017.  To have been found worthy of inclusion for this assignment is humbling, any lawyer (young or old) would be excited at such an opportunity. An opportunity to practice law at Kenya’s  apex court, in one of the most contentious issue the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over! One hell of an emotive issue too!  I accepted and was immediately tasked with the preparation of the Petition’s principal affidavit. The next 7 days were going to be a roller coaster. From sleepless nights and nights with little sleep, to change of location nearly 4 times for fear of police raids, late night meetings with lawyers i never dream...