Skip to main content

Access To Justice...

Charles Dickens ‘A Tale of Two Cities’ describes Old Bailey, “It was famous, too, for pillory, a wise old institution, that inflicted a punishment of which no one could foresee the extent; also, for whipping post, another dear old institution, very humanizing and softening to behold in action; also, for extensive transactions in blood money, another fragment of ancestral wisdom, systematically leading to the most frightening mercenary crimes that could be committed under heaven….. For people then paid to see the play at the Old Bailey, just as they paid to see the play in Bedlam – only the former entertainment was much more dearer.”

This creative description in those olden days by Dickens paints a vivid picture of how the courts of law were then held. The court and its proceedings were a spectacle, the men in robes - almost immortal, meting out punishment and intimidating the common folk who viewed the institution in awe. Indeed, the prevailing view of the courts and what they represented, though in many ways exaggerated and satirized is a reflection of how the courts have for a long time been viewed. The court up until recently has been viewed as incapable of being approached by the poor for a good cause but rather only used to punish poor voiceless ‘earthlings’. Of course the court has struggled to shed off this turgid image that lingers as a dark cloud. Access to justice has been at the center of the reform struggle for a long time and the Constitution has enabled easier access to the courts especially to secure the protection of rights (Article 22). 

Access to justice is an important right for a nation and a people keen on the protection of its most vulnerable. Having it as a constitutional provision (Article 48) is one thing... people feeling that they can freely access the courts when their rights have been infringed or violated without fear of suffering further from long, winding and complicated   processes is another. That ought to be the aim of the courts as they proceed on their commendable task of judicial reforms.

The state has a constitutionally mandated task of removing any impediments to access to justice. Judicial reforms is just one of these. The laxity of the Government to fund the legal aid scheme or support organisations involved in legal aid is a great concern.

The spirit that informed and greatly influenced such constitutional provisions has to be kept in mind. Make legal aid an agenda...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Madaraka Day @49 – What Exactly Does Attaining Self Rule Mean?

Courtesy of The Daily Nation The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (adopted 14 th December, 1960) says the following about the importance of Independence; “ The General Assembly, Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory… .” The Preamble to the Constitution of Kenya 2010 says; “ We the people of Kenya – Honouring those who heroically struggled to bring freedom and justice to our land: Exercising our sovereign and inalienable right to determine the form of governance ...

LATEST COURT OF APPEAL APPOINTMENTS - Kudos JSC!!

Once again the JSC is 'on-point' in its latest appointment of 7 new judges of the Court of Appeal. The ration of appointments is clearly in favour of the women i.e. 5 out of the 7 are women. This follows the earlier appointment of 28 new judges of the High Court 13 of whom were women. Indeed, the Court of Appeal has been largely identified with a perpetual delay in the administration with many calling upon it to work at changing its public image. Indeed, the Justice William Ouko led Task force report not only only found that there were vacancies at the court of appeal (11 instead of the then 14 allowed) but even out of the 11 judges, there was no woman judge at the Court of Appeal. The Constitution of Kenya, as a result of a reflection on some of these grave inequities and disparities is very clear on the issue of gender representation at all levels of and in all arms of government. Whether a woman judge matters can be seen from some reflections in this rather short, simple...

THE “HOUSE OF TERROR” – Reflections….

The "House of Terror" - Budapest, 1062 Andrassy ut 60 So today I finally got to visit the ‘House of Terror’ one of those places you certainly ought to visit if you ever pass by Budapest, Hungary! It is described as a museum that commemorates the victims of terror as well as a reminder of the dreadful acts of terror carried out by ‘victimizers’. The building, and the museum inside are a vivid, impressive recreation of different periods of Hungarian history that the country has tried to move on from albeit painfully. The Different sections of the Museum that begins with a hallway full of victims, then instruments of torture, actual cells, gallows and a morgue, witness accounts displayed on screens and pictures that tell a thousand words all bear testimony to the atrocities witnessed and meted. The building housed the Hungarian Nazis in the early 1940’s and later a residence of the AVO and subsequently the AVH who are known to have participated in the worst forms of crimes agai...