Skip to main content

East African Court of Justice - Extended Jurisdiction

In regional news, The East African Court of Justice (EACJ) can now handle crimes of international proportion such as genocide, crimes against humanity, terrorism and war crimes following endorsement by East African Community Heads of State.
The extension of the Court's mandate was made during the EAC Heads of State Summit in Nairobi, Kenya, last week, that was held under the theme, "Deepening and accelerating integration: Towards Political Federation."

The EACJ is the judicial body of the East African Community (EAC). The Court has jurisdiction over the interpretation and application of the East African Treaty of 1999. The Court does not have competence to hear individual complaints of alleged violations of human rights law. 

The Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community sets out in Article 27 that, “The Court shall have such other original, appellate, human rights and other jurisdiction as will be determined by the Council at a suitable subsequent date. To this end, the Partner States shall conclude a protocol to operationalise the extended jurisdiction.”

Efforts to operationalise this extended jurisdiction begun many years ago culminating in May 2005 when the Council of Ministers issued a Draft Protocol to operationalise the Extended Jurisdiction of the East African Court of Justice. Nearly 10 years later, the Protocol has not yet been approved.

It is therefore suspect that the Summit would opt to rush to give the Court jurisdiction over International Crimes and Terrorism while neglecting a nearly 10 year wait for the Court's Human Rights Jurisdiction. Interestingly, international crimes issues still significantly touch on human rights violations. 

 The Summit's decision is not surprising given the recent utterances and push by organs of the EAC including the Summit and the East African Legislative Assembly(EALA) to have the cases against Kenya's President Kenyatta, Deputy President Ruto and Journalist Sang brought to Arusha. Following this, the Court's Registrar announced that it had the capacity to try international crimes. 

The Court has however not shied away from adjudicating over matters touching on human rights. The Court has creatively dealt with human rights issues using Rule of law provisions e.g. in the Katabazi Case  where the court did not evaluate the claims within a human rights framework but found that the respondent had violated the principle of the rule of law and consequently contravened the Treaty. 

If the region is focused on improving the lives and dignity of its over 140 Million citizens, then the Human Rights language should form a constant part of the discussions around regional integration. It is hoped that the Protocol will be signed soon and the same reflected in constitutions and laws of all the five EAC member states. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Integrity and Moral Probity…..hmmmmh?!?!?

As vetting approaches and the potentially high number of judicial officers likely to face the ‘phase 2’ purge… lawyers are falling over each other trying to polish their résumés in the hope of filling up the already empty slots as well as the soon to be vacancies. Hence begs the questions, are these legal practitioners (even with their impressive résumés) going to qualify for these positions? Are they really going to prove that they are persons of integrity? Are we likely to get a fresh deluge of ‘wikileakes’ discrediting their claims as persons of integrity? I have no doubt that many in my profession are persons who conduct their businesses either in private practice, public service or civil society with the highest level of integrity…..but then how many???    As I read the Article is The Standard on confessions of how a lawyer helps pirates ‘clean’ their money….I was left asking my self thought provoking questions as to how many lawyers today would pass the Constitutio...
3 comments
Read more

THE “HOUSE OF TERROR” – Reflections….

The "House of Terror" - Budapest, 1062 Andrassy ut 60 So today I finally got to visit the ‘House of Terror’ one of those places you certainly ought to visit if you ever pass by Budapest, Hungary! It is described as a museum that commemorates the victims of terror as well as a reminder of the dreadful acts of terror carried out by ‘victimizers’. The building, and the museum inside are a vivid, impressive recreation of different periods of Hungarian history that the country has tried to move on from albeit painfully. The Different sections of the Museum that begins with a hallway full of victims, then instruments of torture, actual cells, gallows and a morgue, witness accounts displayed on screens and pictures that tell a thousand words all bear testimony to the atrocities witnessed and meted. The building housed the Hungarian Nazis in the early 1940’s and later a residence of the AVO and subsequently the AVH who are known to have participated in the worst forms of crimes agai...
3 comments
Read more

Constitutional CRISIS?!?!?!?!

Even as MPs animatedly bang tables at press conferences and heckle in public (some sadly in their mother tongues [ mzalendo where are you?!? ]) about the illegality of the speaker’s ruling and decision to reject debate on the controversial nominations of the Chief Justice, Attorney General, DPP and Director of Budget, claiming that a rejection of the names will lead to a constitutional crisis come 27 th February, it would be very important, at the earliest to clarify exactly what this constitutional crisis would mean – as opposed to what they want their not so ignorant constituents to believe it to mean. Fiction: The judiciary will be left in a mess-vacuum – headless as it were, if there is no Chief Justice after 27 th February. Fact: The office of the Chief Justice though an important one is mainly administrative and ceremonial (or so it has been made under Gicheru). The Court of Appeal’s Presiding Judge is perfectly capable of overseeing the transition in an acting capacity....
3 comments
Read more