Skip to main content

Court of Appeal Pirates Case Decision...

It is certainly interesting to read the reactions of Kenyans to the High Court Decision by Justice Ibrahim in November, 2010 stating that Kenya had no Criminal Jurisdiction to try Suspected Pirates arrested in the Indian Ocean under Kenyan law, and that the persons ought to be handed over to the UNHCR to be treated as refugees. 

One of the comments in the online edition of the 18th October, 2012 Daily Nation reads in part: 
"Wonder how a thief who gets into my boma cannot face the full wrath of my blunt panga..." 

Well that 'blunt' part was a little too bluntly put!... and since we are a country that is governed by the rule of law and believe in due process, we opt for the decision today of the Court of Appeal which overturned this ruling. Appellate Judges Maraga, Onyango, Vishram, Okwengu and Koome held that that Kenyan courts had jurisdiction to hear and make a determination on piracy cases that have over the years become a 'thorn in the flesh' of Kenya's and East Africa's economic development. 

Am certainly looking forward to reading the allowed Appeal that quashed the decision of the now Supreme Court Judge Ibrahim. 

The amount of economic strain that this decision places on our  already overwhelmed legal system is certainly immense considering the levels of insecurity that have been witnessed along the East African and larger Horn-of Africa coast line. Whether or not the international community will and should invest in this process - as it is a stakeholder and a direct beneficiary of a pirate -free coast line is a discussion for another day.

Kenya has international obligations as provided for in the Constitution as well as under International Law. All state organs are bound by any international instruments that Kenya enters into and the Judiciary is no exception. Let us see how the cases progress at the lower courts and whether there will be enough to sustain convictions.

It would also be interesting to follow debates and discussions on how far our obligations under international law stretch especially when dealing with issues that have economic implication, and whether the courts will at some point have to weigh in on the discussions and make decisions striking a balance between pressing national obligations (like food security, national security, protection of socio-economic rights) and these international obligations. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Madaraka Day @49 – What Exactly Does Attaining Self Rule Mean?

Courtesy of The Daily Nation The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (adopted 14 th December, 1960) says the following about the importance of Independence; “ The General Assembly, Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory… .” The Preamble to the Constitution of Kenya 2010 says; “ We the people of Kenya – Honouring those who heroically struggled to bring freedom and justice to our land: Exercising our sovereign and inalienable right to determine the form of governance ...
Post a Comment
Read more

LATEST COURT OF APPEAL APPOINTMENTS - Kudos JSC!!

Once again the JSC is 'on-point' in its latest appointment of 7 new judges of the Court of Appeal. The ration of appointments is clearly in favour of the women i.e. 5 out of the 7 are women. This follows the earlier appointment of 28 new judges of the High Court 13 of whom were women. Indeed, the Court of Appeal has been largely identified with a perpetual delay in the administration with many calling upon it to work at changing its public image. Indeed, the Justice William Ouko led Task force report not only only found that there were vacancies at the court of appeal (11 instead of the then 14 allowed) but even out of the 11 judges, there was no woman judge at the Court of Appeal. The Constitution of Kenya, as a result of a reflection on some of these grave inequities and disparities is very clear on the issue of gender representation at all levels of and in all arms of government. Whether a woman judge matters can be seen from some reflections in this rather short, simple...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court Presidential Petition Number 4 of 2017 (Njonjo Mue & Another Vs. Chairperson IEBC & 3 Others

Post backdated to 20th November, 2017:  About 2 weeks ago, i was called up by a seniour lawyer who asked me to join him for an early morning meeting. It is at that meeting that i was invited to be part of the legal team preparing a petition challenging the election of Hon. Uhuru Kenyatta - Supreme Court Presidential Petition 4 of 2017.  To have been found worthy of inclusion for this assignment is humbling, any lawyer (young or old) would be excited at such an opportunity. An opportunity to practice law at Kenya’s  apex court, in one of the most contentious issue the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over! One hell of an emotive issue too!  I accepted and was immediately tasked with the preparation of the Petition’s principal affidavit. The next 7 days were going to be a roller coaster. From sleepless nights and nights with little sleep, to change of location nearly 4 times for fear of police raids, late night meetings with lawyers i never dream...
3 comments
Read more