Skip to main content

THE DISSENTING OPINION IN THE KENYA GOVERNMENT’S APPEAL ON ADMISSIBILITY



Judge Nsereko (Appeals Chamber Presiding Judge - Government of Kenya Admissibility Challenge) 

Once again Kenya’s rot was brought to the fore with the rejection and throwing out of the Appeal on admissibility, which was aimed at having the case against the six suspects dismissed, and affirming a decision of the Pre-trial Chamber on the admissibility challenge.

Reading the ICC Appeals Chamber’s decision the Presiding Ugandan Judge Daniel David Ntanda Nsereko pointed out that Pre-trial’s chamber’s same person same conduct test was appropriate. He said that the Pre-trial chamber correctly decided that the cases against the suspects were admissible.

The court said that the suspects’ conduct had not been investigated by the national jurisdiction and therefore there was no need to find the case inadmissible.

There is however still a chance for each of the suspects to file their own fresh admissibility challenge, but my ‘palm reader’…… and my more learned and realistic gut feeling tells me that it is bound to be as futile as that of the Government of Kenya.  

There was a dissenting opinion by Lithuanian Judge Anita Usacka who pointed out that she regretted that the lower court did not ask for arguments on vital points, such as what exactly constitutes an investigation and what a State must do to prove that it has opened one.

Should this dissenting opinion be construed to mean that the Judge totally faulted both the procedural and substantive actions and decisions of the Pre- Trial Chamber? If the points had been raised – putting into consideration that there is no ICC jurisprudence to date on these points, would it have meant a dismissal of the cases against the case – a victory for the Kenyan Government?

The truth of the matter is that Kenya put up a lousy case at that level and not even a thorough spoon-feeding by the Pre- Trial chamber would have made a difference.

My opinion – in its humblest form – is that the chances by the suspects to successfully put up an admissibility challenge are high considering the lessons so far learnt. The chances are slightly higher than those of the Kenyan Government, but considering the fact that the Government had absolutely no chance of success….you get my drift as to how much of a chance each of the suspects has…..

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Integrity and Moral Probity…..hmmmmh?!?!?

As vetting approaches and the potentially high number of judicial officers likely to face the ‘phase 2’ purge… lawyers are falling over each other trying to polish their résumés in the hope of filling up the already empty slots as well as the soon to be vacancies. Hence begs the questions, are these legal practitioners (even with their impressive résumés) going to qualify for these positions? Are they really going to prove that they are persons of integrity? Are we likely to get a fresh deluge of ‘wikileakes’ discrediting their claims as persons of integrity? I have no doubt that many in my profession are persons who conduct their businesses either in private practice, public service or civil society with the highest level of integrity…..but then how many???    As I read the Article is The Standard on confessions of how a lawyer helps pirates ‘clean’ their money….I was left asking my self thought provoking questions as to how many lawyers today would pass the Constitutio...
3 comments
Read more

THE “HOUSE OF TERROR” – Reflections….

The "House of Terror" - Budapest, 1062 Andrassy ut 60 So today I finally got to visit the ‘House of Terror’ one of those places you certainly ought to visit if you ever pass by Budapest, Hungary! It is described as a museum that commemorates the victims of terror as well as a reminder of the dreadful acts of terror carried out by ‘victimizers’. The building, and the museum inside are a vivid, impressive recreation of different periods of Hungarian history that the country has tried to move on from albeit painfully. The Different sections of the Museum that begins with a hallway full of victims, then instruments of torture, actual cells, gallows and a morgue, witness accounts displayed on screens and pictures that tell a thousand words all bear testimony to the atrocities witnessed and meted. The building housed the Hungarian Nazis in the early 1940’s and later a residence of the AVO and subsequently the AVH who are known to have participated in the worst forms of crimes agai...
3 comments
Read more

Constitutional CRISIS?!?!?!?!

Even as MPs animatedly bang tables at press conferences and heckle in public (some sadly in their mother tongues [ mzalendo where are you?!? ]) about the illegality of the speaker’s ruling and decision to reject debate on the controversial nominations of the Chief Justice, Attorney General, DPP and Director of Budget, claiming that a rejection of the names will lead to a constitutional crisis come 27 th February, it would be very important, at the earliest to clarify exactly what this constitutional crisis would mean – as opposed to what they want their not so ignorant constituents to believe it to mean. Fiction: The judiciary will be left in a mess-vacuum – headless as it were, if there is no Chief Justice after 27 th February. Fact: The office of the Chief Justice though an important one is mainly administrative and ceremonial (or so it has been made under Gicheru). The Court of Appeal’s Presiding Judge is perfectly capable of overseeing the transition in an acting capacity....
3 comments
Read more