Skip to main content

THE DISSENTING OPINION IN THE KENYA GOVERNMENT’S APPEAL ON ADMISSIBILITY



Judge Nsereko (Appeals Chamber Presiding Judge - Government of Kenya Admissibility Challenge) 

Once again Kenya’s rot was brought to the fore with the rejection and throwing out of the Appeal on admissibility, which was aimed at having the case against the six suspects dismissed, and affirming a decision of the Pre-trial Chamber on the admissibility challenge.

Reading the ICC Appeals Chamber’s decision the Presiding Ugandan Judge Daniel David Ntanda Nsereko pointed out that Pre-trial’s chamber’s same person same conduct test was appropriate. He said that the Pre-trial chamber correctly decided that the cases against the suspects were admissible.

The court said that the suspects’ conduct had not been investigated by the national jurisdiction and therefore there was no need to find the case inadmissible.

There is however still a chance for each of the suspects to file their own fresh admissibility challenge, but my ‘palm reader’…… and my more learned and realistic gut feeling tells me that it is bound to be as futile as that of the Government of Kenya.  

There was a dissenting opinion by Lithuanian Judge Anita Usacka who pointed out that she regretted that the lower court did not ask for arguments on vital points, such as what exactly constitutes an investigation and what a State must do to prove that it has opened one.

Should this dissenting opinion be construed to mean that the Judge totally faulted both the procedural and substantive actions and decisions of the Pre- Trial Chamber? If the points had been raised – putting into consideration that there is no ICC jurisprudence to date on these points, would it have meant a dismissal of the cases against the case – a victory for the Kenyan Government?

The truth of the matter is that Kenya put up a lousy case at that level and not even a thorough spoon-feeding by the Pre- Trial chamber would have made a difference.

My opinion – in its humblest form – is that the chances by the suspects to successfully put up an admissibility challenge are high considering the lessons so far learnt. The chances are slightly higher than those of the Kenyan Government, but considering the fact that the Government had absolutely no chance of success….you get my drift as to how much of a chance each of the suspects has…..

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Madaraka Day @49 – What Exactly Does Attaining Self Rule Mean?

Courtesy of The Daily Nation The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (adopted 14 th December, 1960) says the following about the importance of Independence; “ The General Assembly, Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory… .” The Preamble to the Constitution of Kenya 2010 says; “ We the people of Kenya – Honouring those who heroically struggled to bring freedom and justice to our land: Exercising our sovereign and inalienable right to determine the form of governance ...
Post a Comment
Read more

LATEST COURT OF APPEAL APPOINTMENTS - Kudos JSC!!

Once again the JSC is 'on-point' in its latest appointment of 7 new judges of the Court of Appeal. The ration of appointments is clearly in favour of the women i.e. 5 out of the 7 are women. This follows the earlier appointment of 28 new judges of the High Court 13 of whom were women. Indeed, the Court of Appeal has been largely identified with a perpetual delay in the administration with many calling upon it to work at changing its public image. Indeed, the Justice William Ouko led Task force report not only only found that there were vacancies at the court of appeal (11 instead of the then 14 allowed) but even out of the 11 judges, there was no woman judge at the Court of Appeal. The Constitution of Kenya, as a result of a reflection on some of these grave inequities and disparities is very clear on the issue of gender representation at all levels of and in all arms of government. Whether a woman judge matters can be seen from some reflections in this rather short, simple...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court Presidential Petition Number 4 of 2017 (Njonjo Mue & Another Vs. Chairperson IEBC & 3 Others

Post backdated to 20th November, 2017:  About 2 weeks ago, i was called up by a seniour lawyer who asked me to join him for an early morning meeting. It is at that meeting that i was invited to be part of the legal team preparing a petition challenging the election of Hon. Uhuru Kenyatta - Supreme Court Presidential Petition 4 of 2017.  To have been found worthy of inclusion for this assignment is humbling, any lawyer (young or old) would be excited at such an opportunity. An opportunity to practice law at Kenya’s  apex court, in one of the most contentious issue the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over! One hell of an emotive issue too!  I accepted and was immediately tasked with the preparation of the Petition’s principal affidavit. The next 7 days were going to be a roller coaster. From sleepless nights and nights with little sleep, to change of location nearly 4 times for fear of police raids, late night meetings with lawyers i never dream...
3 comments
Read more