Skip to main content

INTERESTS…WHAT INTERESTS?!?


 The image “http://truthalliance.net/Portals/0/Archive/images/news/2011/01/egypt_protest_350.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Why is it so hard for America to support the cause of the people of Egypt? Why is it so hard for them to label the octogenarian President Mubarak a dictator - as he most truly is? Why does America speak very strongly about upholding the principles of democracy and good governance but fail to see the autocracy and lousy governance of the Egyptian government? Why is it that America is so hell-bent on protecting its so-called interests that the deaths of the now close to 200 Egyptian citizens at the hands of merciless Egyptian police can do nothing to knock sense and humanity into them? What are these interests? Does it have anything to do with America’s nature of exporting human rights abuses? Is America really as democratic in mind as it claims to be? Isn’t America the biggest human rights violator? What does America stand to loose if it proclaimed its support for the repressed Egyptian citizens? Has America made a bad choice of a partner in Mubarak this time round, and is it so stubborn to admit that it has? Why is it so hard for America to hear the hue and cry of the Egyptian citizen who has suffered for a long time from bad governance, a curtailment of fundamental rights and freedoms including the right to a be in an open democratic society? Is it that hard, this time round, for ‘big-brother’ America to condemn Mubarak’s desperate and deleterious attempts to cling to power? Is America waiting for a million people to die before it comes in as was the case in Rwanda? Are the purported practices of detentions, torture and "extrajudicial killings” by Mubarak’s government in line with America’s foreign policy? Does Africa have to beg for American intervetion – even when it’s quite clear that the continued instability in Egypt is bad for not only the region but the world at large? How diferent is the egyptian ‘lotus revolution’ from the american declaration of war against a repressive Great Britain in 1812 or the Civil wars of the 1860’s? Is it that much of a wrenching struggle to balance strategic interests, including loyalty to allies in the Middle East, with its desire for political reform in the region? Is it so late (and such an inconvenience to American) to let a country embrace democracy and good governance? Does America share the opinion that the internationally celebrated Noble Peace Prize winner, Mohammad Al Baradei is a dissident – a terrorist as the Egyptian government claims? WHAT REALLY ARE THESE INTERESTS?!?

Well, at the end of these close to TWENTY-ONE QUESTIONS…..I still can’t figure out what these interests are….!!!

Comments

  1. Ivory PunkFebruary 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM

    Rhetorical questions.We all know America is a selfish bug interested only in being a super power(though they are failing)and imposing their demands on the rest of us. They are like a spoilt last born child always crying for the biggest share.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Integrity and Moral Probity…..hmmmmh?!?!?

As vetting approaches and the potentially high number of judicial officers likely to face the ‘phase 2’ purge… lawyers are falling over each other trying to polish their résumés in the hope of filling up the already empty slots as well as the soon to be vacancies. Hence begs the questions, are these legal practitioners (even with their impressive résumés) going to qualify for these positions? Are they really going to prove that they are persons of integrity? Are we likely to get a fresh deluge of ‘wikileakes’ discrediting their claims as persons of integrity? I have no doubt that many in my profession are persons who conduct their businesses either in private practice, public service or civil society with the highest level of integrity…..but then how many???    As I read the Article is The Standard on confessions of how a lawyer helps pirates ‘clean’ their money….I was left asking my self thought provoking questions as to how many lawyers today would pass the Constitutio...
3 comments
Read more

THE “HOUSE OF TERROR” – Reflections….

The "House of Terror" - Budapest, 1062 Andrassy ut 60 So today I finally got to visit the ‘House of Terror’ one of those places you certainly ought to visit if you ever pass by Budapest, Hungary! It is described as a museum that commemorates the victims of terror as well as a reminder of the dreadful acts of terror carried out by ‘victimizers’. The building, and the museum inside are a vivid, impressive recreation of different periods of Hungarian history that the country has tried to move on from albeit painfully. The Different sections of the Museum that begins with a hallway full of victims, then instruments of torture, actual cells, gallows and a morgue, witness accounts displayed on screens and pictures that tell a thousand words all bear testimony to the atrocities witnessed and meted. The building housed the Hungarian Nazis in the early 1940’s and later a residence of the AVO and subsequently the AVH who are known to have participated in the worst forms of crimes agai...
3 comments
Read more

Constitutional CRISIS?!?!?!?!

Even as MPs animatedly bang tables at press conferences and heckle in public (some sadly in their mother tongues [ mzalendo where are you?!? ]) about the illegality of the speaker’s ruling and decision to reject debate on the controversial nominations of the Chief Justice, Attorney General, DPP and Director of Budget, claiming that a rejection of the names will lead to a constitutional crisis come 27 th February, it would be very important, at the earliest to clarify exactly what this constitutional crisis would mean – as opposed to what they want their not so ignorant constituents to believe it to mean. Fiction: The judiciary will be left in a mess-vacuum – headless as it were, if there is no Chief Justice after 27 th February. Fact: The office of the Chief Justice though an important one is mainly administrative and ceremonial (or so it has been made under Gicheru). The Court of Appeal’s Presiding Judge is perfectly capable of overseeing the transition in an acting capacity....
3 comments
Read more